Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://physrep.ff.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1160
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMesinger, Fedoren
dc.contributor.authorVeljović, Katarinaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-12T18:29:05Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-12T18:29:05Z-
dc.date.issued2020-01-01en
dc.identifier.issn0026-1165en
dc.identifier.urihttps://physrep.ff.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1160-
dc.description.abstractWhile the terrain-following (sigma) system of representing topography in atmospheric models has been dominant for about the last 60 years, already half a century ago problems using the system were reported in areas of steep topography. A number of schemes had been proposed to address these problems. However, when topography steepness exceeds a given limit all these schemes except the vertical interpolation of the pressure gradient begin to use model information that for physical reasons they should not use. A radical departure from the system was that of the step-topography eta; but its attractiveness was reduced by the discovery of the corner separation problem. The shaved-cell scheme, nowadays referred to as cut-cell, was free of that problem, and was tested subsequently in idealized as well as real case experiments with encouraging results. The eta discretization has lately been refined to make it also a cut-cell scheme. Another method referred to usually as immersed boundary method enabling treatment of terrain as complex as urban landscape came from computational fluid dynamics. It was made available coupled to the atmospheric Weather Research and Forecasting model. Results of recent experiments of the cut-cell Eta driven by European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) ensemble members are analyzed. In these experiments, all cut-cell Eta members achieved better verification scores with respect to 250 hPa wind speed than their ECMWF driver members. This occurred when an upper-tropospheric trough was crossing the Rocky Mountains barrier. These results are considerably less favorable for the Eta when switched to use sigma, i.e., Eta/sigma, pointing to the benefits of using topography intersecting as opposed to terrain-following systems. But even so the Eta/sigma shows an advantage over its driver members, suggesting that its other features deserve attention.en
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of the Meteorological Society of Japanen
dc.subjectCut-cell schemesen
dc.subjectImmersed boundary methodsen
dc.subjectRegional climate modelingen
dc.subjectRepresentation of topographyen
dc.subjectSpectral nudgingen
dc.subjectTerrain-following systemsen
dc.titleTopography in weather and climate models: Lessons from cut-cell eta vs. european centre for medium-range weather forecasts experimentsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.2151/jmsj.2020-050en
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85093969720en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85093969720en
dc.relation.issue5en
dc.relation.volume98en
dc.relation.firstpage881en
dc.relation.lastpage900en
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

7
checked on Nov 14, 2024

Page view(s)

12
checked on Nov 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.