Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://physrep.ff.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/374
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorĆurić, Mladjenen
dc.contributor.authorJanc, Dejanen
dc.contributor.authorVeljović, Katarinaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-12T15:23:43Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-12T15:23:43Z-
dc.date.issued2010-01-01en
dc.identifier.issn0177-798Xen
dc.identifier.urihttps://physrep.ff.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/374-
dc.description.abstractConvective precipitation is the main cause of extreme rainfall events in small areas. Its primary characteristics are both large spatial and temporal variability. For this reason, the monitoring of accumulated precipitation fields (liquid and solid components) at the surface is difficult to carry out through the use of rain gauge networks or remote-sensing observations. Alternatively, numerical models seem to be the most powerful tool in simulating convective precipitation for various analyses and predictions. Due to a lack of comparisons between modelled and observed precipitation characteristics over a long period of time, we focus our research on comparisons between observations and three model samples of accumulated convective precipitation over a particular study area. We use a numerical cloud model with two model schemes involving the unified Khrgian-Mazin size distribution of cloud drops and a model scheme involving a monodisperse cloud droplet spectrum and the Marshall-Palmer size distribution for raindrops, respectively. For comparison, we have selected a study area with a sounding site. Our analysis shows that the model version with the Khrgian-Mazin size distribution exhibits a better agreement with the observed mean, median and range of extreme values of accumulated convective precipitation. Model simulations with the Khrgian-Mazin size distribution most closely match observations, with a correlation coefficient of 0.91. Use of the Marshall-Palmer size distribution, on the other hand, systemically underestimates the observed precipitation and has the lowest correlation coefficient among the methods, 0.83. Such an investigation is crucial to improve predictions of accumulated convective precipitation for various climatological and hydrological analyses and predictions. © 2010 Springer-Verlag.en
dc.relation.ispartofTheoretical and Applied Climatologyen
dc.titleDependence of accumulated precipitation on cloud drop size distributionen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00704-010-0332-5en
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78249272319en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/78249272319en
dc.relation.issue3en
dc.relation.volume102en
dc.relation.firstpage471en
dc.relation.lastpage481en
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

12
checked on Sep 14, 2024

Page view(s)

3
checked on Sep 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.