Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://physrep.ff.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/569
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHan, Len
dc.contributor.authorPatil, Sen
dc.contributor.authorBoehm, Den
dc.contributor.authorMilosavljević, Vladimiren
dc.contributor.authorCullen, P Jen
dc.contributor.authorBourke, Pen
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-12T16:01:37Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-12T16:01:37Z-
dc.date.issued2016en
dc.identifier.issn0099-2240en
dc.identifier.urihttps://physrep.ff.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/569-
dc.description.abstractAtmospheric cold plasma (ACP) is a promising nonthermal technology effective against a wide range of pathogenic microorganisms. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) play a crucial inactivation role when air or other oxygen-containing gases are used. With strong oxidative stress, cells can be damaged by lipid peroxidation, enzyme inactivation, and DNA cleavage. Identification of ROS and an understanding of their role are important for advancing ACP applications for a range of complex microbiological issues. In this study, the inactivation efficacy of in-package high-voltage (80 kV [root mean square]) ACP (HVACP) and the role of intracellular ROS were investigated. Two mechanisms of inactivation were observed in which reactive species were found to either react primarily with the cell envelope or damage intracellular components. Escherichia coli was inactivated mainly by cell leakage and low-level DNA damage. Conversely, Staphylococcus aureus was mainly inactivated by intracellular damage, with significantly higher levels of intracellular ROS observed and little envelope damage. However, for both bacteria studied, increasing treatment time had a positive effect on the intracellular ROS levels generated.en
dc.language.isoenen
dc.relation.ispartofApplied and environmental microbiologyen
dc.subject.meshDisinfectionen
dc.subject.meshEscherichia colien
dc.subject.meshPlasma Gasesen
dc.subject.meshStaphylococcus aureusen
dc.titleMechanisms of Inactivation by High-Voltage Atmospheric Cold Plasma Differ for Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureusen
dc.typeEvaluation Studyen
dc.typeJournal Articleen
dc.typeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten
dc.identifier.doi10.1128/AEM.02660-15en
dc.identifier.pmid26519396en
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84953911388en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/84953911388en
dc.relation.issue2en
dc.relation.volume82en
dc.relation.firstpage450-8en
dc.relation.lastpage458en
item.grantfulltextnone-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairetypeEvaluation Study-
item.openairetypeJournal Article-
item.openairetypeResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.languageiso639-1en-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7805-5189-
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

337
checked on Dec 15, 2024

Page view(s)

111
checked on Dec 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.