Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://physrep.ff.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/976
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaleem, Mubbshiren
dc.contributor.authorBiondo, Omaren
dc.contributor.authorSretenović, Goranen
dc.contributor.authorTomei, Giuliaen
dc.contributor.authorMagarotto, Mirkoen
dc.contributor.authorPavarin, Danieleen
dc.contributor.authorMarotta, Esteren
dc.contributor.authorParadisi, Cristinaen
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-12T18:06:01Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-12T18:06:01Z-
dc.date.issued2020-02-15en
dc.identifier.issn1385-8947en
dc.identifier.urihttps://physrep.ff.bg.ac.rs/handle/123456789/976-
dc.description.abstractThe development of efficient plasma-based technologies for water treatment in general and decontamination from perfluoroalkyl substances, in particular, is a timely and challenging research topic. This study investigated the degradation of PFOA (perfluorooctanoic acid) in water using three reactors with different configurations and implementing different plasma regimes. Two reactors were available from previous studies on other recalcitrant pollutants and use, respectively, corona discharge and plasma in gas bubbles. The third reactor was designed and developed for this specific application and uses a self-pulsing streamer discharge (SPD) over the liquid surface. The performance of the three reactors was assessed and compared using air as plasma feed gas and a PFOA solution (41.4 mg/L) in Milli-Q-water. The SPD reactor was found to be the most efficient in terms of energy efficiency and PFOA conversion and degradation rate. It was therefore further tested and characterized by studying the effects of changing the aqueous media in which PFOA was dissolved (Milli-Q and tap water) and the plasma feed gas (synthetic air, ambient air and argon). Due to the formation of nitrous and nitric acids, especially for plasma generated in ambient and synthetic air, the solution pH, conductivity, and hence the plasma input power changed significantly during the experiments. The best results were obtained using argon for plasma inception and PFOA solutions in tap water: the energy efficiency and fluoride recovery were 561 mg/kWh and 47%, respectively.en
dc.relation.ispartofChemical Engineering Journalen
dc.subjectDC coronaen
dc.subjectPFOAen
dc.subjectPlasma in gas bubblesen
dc.subjectSelf-pulsing dischargeen
dc.titleComparative performance assessment of plasma reactors for the treatment of PFOA; reactor design, kinetics, mineralization and energy yielden
dc.typeArticleen
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cej.2019.123031en
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85074532008en
dc.identifier.urlhttps://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85074532008en
dc.relation.volume382en
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Appears in Collections:Journal Article
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

72
checked on Nov 23, 2024

Page view(s)

17
checked on Nov 29, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.